Academic English Generator  
 

 

Unit 14.5        Interview

 

Here are the same eight questions from exercise 14.4. They come from an interview with a trainer from an outdoor education organisation. He specialises in organising team-building programmes for major companies, in which employees from different sectors of the company come together and spend a week together far away from the city performing a number of tasks together. Now you have the answers to the questions - but there are two answers below for each question. Click on the one you think  is the real answer to the question. The other one is written in correct English, but just doesn't answer the question.

 

In what ways is an outdoor education programme like yours able to contribute towards team-building in a business context?

 

Yes, I would say that many business leaders do still seem to be unaware of the importance of team-building and of how much it contributes to the performance of the organisation. In the context of modern business, where so many projects depend on close liaison - often across cultural and geographical boundaries - team-building is a highly cost-effective investment for any knowledge-intensive organisation. 

Our philosophy focuses on the development of personal skills, responsibility to others and the ability to deal with new challenges through outdoor experiences. The tasks we set and the careful preparation we offer participants maximises the opportunities to develop team-building skills which participants can take back to the workplace.



What kinds of organization participate in your programmes?

 

The organization runs a wide range of programmes for different client groups. My particular role involves working with business clients – as it happens, more than half of my client groups have been from the banking and finance sectors – partly, perhaps because of the costs involved, but also I think because of the exceptional challenges and changes experienced in that sector.

Actually, this covers a really broad sector of the business world. Companies within the mining sector have been particularly generous, sponsoring a number of our educational programmes based in schools. There has also been direct funding from a number of public bodies - not only those from the education sector. In fact, we also run a number of programmes as part of the rehabilitation of young offenders.

 

In designing individual programmes for business organizations, how closely do you liaise with Human Resources managers?  

 

This is very much the key to the success of our programmes. We need to work together to ensure participants are appropriately selected, informed and prepared for the programmes. And after the programme has finished, Human Resources takes an even more direct role in the follow-up stage.


Very much so. In fact, HR professionals are among our most successful participants. One of our new programmes, in fact, has been specially designed for professionals working within this often quite stressful field, where decisions about employee recruitment, training, discipline etc have to be made on a daily basis.

 

We’ve all seen reality programmes like ‘Survivor’ on television. Do you feel the need to reassure participants that they won’t be treated in the same way as those programmes?  

 

Yes, this is a matter of growing concern, in particular for those programmes involving younger people. As you suggest, it is the parents, more than the young people themselves, who require reassurance. We find it's probably not enough to send them our mission statement or even a detailed breakdown of the aims and content of our programmes. Much more effective, in my view, are the regular open-evenings at which carers, guardians and parents are invited to participate in a range of activities designed to demonstrate the true character of what we are trying to achieve.

From my point of view, reality TV has taken the body of outdoor education and thrown away the soul! Our participants have to realise that, instead of aiming to fight and put each other down, their goal is to achieve the best both for themselves personally and for the group. These days I often show people an extract from a programme and talk through the issues to make sure they understand that what we’re offering is a totally different – and positive – experience.

 

How can you be sure that your programmes are compatible with the needs and goals of your business partners?

 

I think this is probably something that every business finds challenging. New programs and applications seem to emerge so quickly nowadays that it's increasingly difficult to ensure compatability across the diverse systems and hardware already in use within the organisation. We have found, however, that since we have been working with a specialist IT consultancy, compatability problems have been very much reduced.

This is quite a challenge at times, I have to admit. Our philosophy and programmes come from a context far removed from the world of business. My impression is that modern business comprises a wide variety of systems and approaches. Not all companies will find our programmes are the right match for their own approach to individuals and teams. However, I do believe that our core values are in tune with the those of most successful modern organizations.

 

You have worked with a wide range of organizations. Are your programmes similarly diverse?

 

I certainly hope so. It's important that we do at least seek to implement a high degree of standardisation in our products - otherwise, all of the hard work done by our research and development and sales teams will have gone to waste. That is why we monitor output closely and when variations are detected, not only are those products are withdrawn from sale, but the production process is revised in order to guarantee the quality and identity of the products our consumers expect. 

Yes and no. Yes, we do aim to adapt our programmes carefully to match the goals and needs of individual groups. But it’s also true that the basic elements of our programmes remain the same. And, of course, all our programmes aim to achieve our core aims of personal and social development through working together to overcome challenges in the natural environment.

 

When senior managers participate in programmes with more junior members of staff, does this lead to difficulties related to status? 

 

This can be a key issue – particularly in the ‘forming’ and ‘storming’ stages of the typical team development process. However, through careful preparation, we try to ensure that there’s no misunderstanding of the nature of the programme. All participants need to realise they have to leave their egos at home!

Unfortunately, this can still be a problem, even in a country like this. And not only in the more traditional sectors of the economy either. Some men probably feel the need to return to some kind of traditional masculine roles in the outdoors perhaps, even when they are quite comfortable working for female bosses in an office environment. However, this, like so much of what we do, is the opportunity for a good deal of learning and personal development, as long as it is handled skillfully by our facilitators. 

 

During the short time frame available on your courses, what can be done to facilitate long-term team-building?

 

There are various indications that participants are working together effectively as a team. Attitudes tend to be more positive and communication is richer and more evenly shared. A successful team asks and listens more, for instance. Team members tend to anticipate eachother's needs, rather than waiting for problems to emerge. And overall, there's a sense that the individual goals and the goals of the team have somehow merged into one.

As I mentioned in my previous answer, this is where the liaison with Human Resources plays a crucial role. They need to both evaluate the outcomes and ensure the participants are able to apply the personal and social development skills they’ve achieved during the course to their current and future working environments.


Back ] Home ] Up ] Next ]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Materials by Martin McMorrow, Massey University Auckland.